From policy to proof

Your staff signed the policy.That doesn't mean they follow it.

The Oromis dashboard: 58 people not following policy out of 81 observed, broken down by requirement into understood-but-not-done, not yet understood, and holding — alongside open findings and survey readiness by standard.

Demo facility data

Oromis helps healthcare leaders track and prove which of their staff understand and follow policies on the floor.

See how it works
The problem

Leadership is flying blind
on the floor.

Three things you can say about a policy. Most facilities can only say the first two.

Attested

Every facility has this.

It proves receipt, and nothing else.

Trained

Facility-specific policy training, by role, is rare.

Live training proves attendance, not understanding.

Followed

Where you actually stand, before a survey rather than after.

No system shows you this today.

The first two tell you about your paperwork. Only the third tells you what affects a patient.

5.9%

lower 30-day mortality while inspectors were in the building — then back to baseline. Practice changes when someone is watching.

R500k–R5M+

per medical negligence claim — and the leading cause is staff not following standardised procedures.

Medical negligence claims in South Africa trace most often to staff not following standardised procedures.

Per Prinsen, SA Medical Journal 2023That cost does not arrive on inspection day. It arrives as a claim, years later, when the only question is what you can prove about a shift nobody remembers.

How it works

Your policies and your data,
measured against the standards.

You send what you already have. Oromis maps it to the standards you're judged against and produces what your team hands over.

The standards you're judged against

OHSC Norms & StandardsSANCCOHSASAPOPIA

What you send

Your policies
Training records
Practice data from your EHR
Incident reports

Oromis

maps every policy and event to the requirement it answers

What you get

Evidence pack for a survey
Live readiness dashboard
Internal reports by unit and role

Training is generated from your own policies per role, or pulled from the LMS you already run. The practice export carries no patient identifiers.

The proof

Reports no one else can produce.
Pull-ready, not manual.

On the left, what Oromis generates.On the right, what producing it by hand costs you today.

Understood it. Not doing it.

Demo data

J. Okonkwo · RN · ICU

understood · not done

M. Haddad · RN · 4-West

understood · not done

S. Reyes · LPN · ED

understood · not done

Live, per requirement and per person — the cohort your training is already reaching and still not changing.

Oromis Quality Improvement Cycle Report for Protea Private Hospital, showing findings, interventions and outcomes

Every requirement mapped to the standard it's judged against, exported as one binder — filterable to a single unit or an overnight shift, version-pinned and de-identified.

By hand, today

R393,900 / year

606 leadership hours × R650/hr

R/hr

0.3h each

5 / week

78 h

2h each

4 / month

96 h

5h each

12 / year

60 h

13h each · ≈40 charts at the OIG's ~20 min per chart

1 / month

156 h

18h each

4 / year

72 h

10h each

4 / year

40 h

40h each

1 / year

40 h

4h each

16 / year

64 h

Total

606 h · R393,900

Real files built from demo facility data, formatted the way a inspector expects them.

What you already pay for

Every system holds half the answer.
None of them hold both.

You have probably bought all four already. Each one is good at its job.

What each kind of system can prove, compared with Oromis
SystemAttestedTrainedFollowedPer requirementJoined
Your LMSSigned for — receipt recorded: noTraining delivered and completion recorded: yesWhat actually happened on the floor: noTracked at the single requirement, not the whole policy: noBoth halves for the same named person — understood, and done: no
Your policy managerSigned for — receipt recorded: yesTraining delivered and completion recorded: noWhat actually happened on the floor: noTracked at the single requirement, not the whole policy: noBoth halves for the same named person — understood, and done: no
Your EHRSigned for — receipt recorded: noTraining delivered and completion recorded: noWhat actually happened on the floor: partlyTracked at the single requirement, not the whole policy: noBoth halves for the same named person — understood, and done: no
Your incident & audit systemSigned for — receipt recorded: noTraining delivered and completion recorded: noWhat actually happened on the floor: partlyTracked at the single requirement, not the whole policy: partlyBoth halves for the same named person — understood, and done: no
OromisSigned for — receipt recorded: yesTraining delivered and completion recorded: yesWhat actually happened on the floor: yesTracked at the single requirement, not the whole policy: yesBoth halves for the same named person — understood, and done: yes

yes partly no

Per requirement — tracked at the single requirement, not the whole policy. Joined — both halves for the same named person: what they understood, and what they did.

Oromis reads all four and keys them to the same requirement. For any requirement, you can see who was trained on it, who understood it, and who is doing it on the floor.

It sits on top of the systems you already run. Nothing gets replaced.

Working with Oromis

Start with one policy.
Extend it when it works.

Every engagement starts small and earns its way to the next stage.

28-day pilot

01

Pick one policy. Prove it end to end.

  • One high-risk policy, one cohort of about 25 staff
  • Mapped to the standards it's judged against
  • Role-specific training built, comprehension measured
  • Cross-tabulated against what happened on the floor

Facility rollout

02

Extend it once you've seen the results.

  • Every high-risk policy, every unit
  • Staff and roles mapped
  • Your EHR and LMS connected
  • One evidence index for the whole facility

Standing system

03

It keeps itself current.

  • New hires picked up automatically
  • Policy versions tracked as they change
  • Evidence stays current between surveys
  • Nothing to assemble the week before
Book a readiness consult

We'll confirm which policy to start with, and whether it fits your inspection cycle.

Security & data

Built for POPIA and the OHSC

Your policies and your staff records are sensitive. We treat them that way.

No patient information reaches Oromis

The practice export is de-identified before it leaves your system — special personal information under POPIA never enters the platform.

POPIA-aligned processing

Purpose-limited, minimal, and retained only as long as the evidence needs to stand. Your information officer gets a processing record.

Historical records retained

When an inspector asks about something from eighteen months ago, your team can pull it. Retrievable by policy, person, or date.

Traceable to your own source

Every row points back to the document or export it came from, so an inspector can cross-check any figure against your system.

Role-based access

A unit manager sees their unit. Encrypted at rest and in transit, with an append-only audit log.

Oromis is an analysis layer, not a source system. It does not alter clinical records — it produces the internal evidence that supports your quality programme.

“You know how many people actually read the policy? Probably no one.”

— Chief Nursing Officer, 30 years in healthcare leadership, former HHS/ONC

Proof they followed it.
Before anyone asks.

See what Oromis produces — the mismatch report and the inspection export your team hands across the table. Straight to your inbox.

Book a call